The effect of network relationship on the performance of SMEs

By Feng-Jyh Lin, Yi-Hsin Lin. 2016

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81170bba176f847f5a7c7dd6d0b253792c9d4cfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Vinit Parida
2. Joakim Wincent
3. Javier Cenamor
4. Paul Schneider

In Strategy and Management

1. Vinit Parida
2. Joakim Wincent
3. R. Prasanna
4. P. Rajapakshe
5. G. Abeyrathne
6. J. Jayasundara
7. E. Ekanayake
8. Sisira Kumara Naradda Gamage

Citations in the corpus

• How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity (2019, background): “Furthermore, by adopting a platform approach, firms accept mutual monitoring mechanisms that make the relationships more transparent, cultivate mutual trust, and mitigate opportunism (Lin & Lin, 2016).”
• Entrepreneurial marketing and firm performance: Synthesis and conceptual development (2020, unknown): “Networks provide actors with valuable operant and operand 2 resources, and enhance organizations' capabilities in a way that creates value for all participants (Guercini & Ranfagni, 2016; Jiang, Tao, & Santoro, 2010; Lin & Lin, 2016; Vargo & Lusch, 2004; Vasilchenko & Morrish, 2011).”
• Sustainability of SMEs in the Competition: A Systemic Review on Technological Challenges and SME Performance (2019, background): “Through business collaboration, firms could obtain scale merits in technology usage through networking but would be careful using alter or sharing technological recourses as its effects on their survival chances [33,87].”