Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading
By Reinhold Kliegl, Ellen Grabner, M. Rolfs, Ralf Engbert. 2004
653 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80e611c6b0bf27f7a76f8cfbb8167c7eccba79ed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Ralph R. Radach
- Ronan G. Reilly
- Antje Nuthmann
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Ralf Engbert
- Marc Brysbaert
- Keith Rayner
- Roger Levy
Citations in the corpus
- Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading (2006, result): “Overall, the pattern of results reported here is on good agreement to the literature (e.g., Kliegl et al., 2004; Rayner, Sereno, & Raney, 1996; Schilling et al., 1998).”
- The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search (2009, neutral): “…Pollatsek, & Rayner, 2007; Vitu, 1991; White, 2008), word predictability (Balota et al., 1985; Drieghe et al., 2005a; S. F. Ehrlich & Rayner, 1981; Kliegl et al., 2004; Rayner & Well, 1996; Zola, 1984), number of meanings (Binder & Morris, 1995; Binder & Rayner, 1998; Dopkins, Morris, & Rayner,…”
- CONTEXTUAL WORD LEARNING DURING READING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE (2017, background): “To some extent, the higher values for the target words are not surprising, as in eye-movement data frequency effects are still observed for well-known words, which the readers have encountered hundreds of times in their life (Kliegl et al., 2004).”
- Parafoveal processing in reading (2011, neutral): “…words are influenced by the predictability of a word, given its preceding context (Balota et al., 1985; Carroll & Slowiaczek, 1986; Duffy & Rayner, 1990; Ehrlich & Rayner, 1981; Inhoff, 1984; Kliegl et al., 2004; Rayner et al., 2001; Schustack, Ehrlich, & Rayner, 1987; Slattery, 2009; Zola, 1984).”
- Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. (2006, background): “Specifically, we offer no explanations for fixation probabilities and locations (but see Engbert et al., 2005; Kliegl & Engbert, 2005; Kliegl et al., 2004; Nuthmann et al., 2005).”