Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations.
By Reinhold Kliegl, Antje Nuthmann, Ralf Engbert. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2006
624 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8fc5fc99a485ad8690433467b10448fb58da352
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Keith Rayner
- Roger Levy
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Antje Nuthmann
- Nathaniel J. Smith
- Elizabeth R. Schotter
- Ralf Engbert
- Bernhard Angele
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Keith Rayner
- Roger Levy
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Nathaniel J. Smith
- Elizabeth R. Schotter
- Bernhard Angele
- Ralf Engbert
- Antje Nuthmann
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Keith Rayner
- Roger Levy
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Nathaniel J. Smith
- Elizabeth R. Schotter
- Ralf Engbert
- M. Masson
- Eike
Citations in the corpus
- The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic (2013, positive): “…which revealed weak or non-existent interactions between predictability and either frequency or word length, but a substantial interaction between frequency and word length, which is consistent with previous findings (Kliegl et al., 2006; Pollatsek, Juhasz, Reichle, Machacek, & Rayner, 2008).)”
- A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming (2010, methodology): “This problem generalizes to the use of repeated-measures multiple regression analysis (e.g., Kliegl et al., 2006; Lorch & Myers, 1990), which has also been shown to run the risk of being anticonservative (Baayen et al., 2008).”
- The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search (2009, methodology): “…of parafoveal-on-foveal effects have largely been based on analyses of large data sets across a corpus of data (Kennedy & Pynte, 2005; Kliegl, 2007; Kliegl et al., 2006; Pynte & Kennedy, 2006), while those that have found no evidence for lexical parafoveal-on-foveal effects are based on…”
- Parafoveal processing in reading (2011, background): “This was demonstrated by Pynte, Kennedy, and Ducrot (2004), who conducted a gaze-contingent boundary experiment where word previews embedded in sentences could contain several different kinds of typographical errors, while the actual target words were always spelled correctly.”
- SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. (2005, background): “Fixation durations on a given word depend not only on the length, frequency, and predictability of the fixated word but also on these properties of the previous (ie, lag) and the next (ie, successor) words (Kliegl, Nuthmann, & Engbert, 2005).”
- Toward a Perceptual-Span Theory of Distributed Processing in Reading: A Reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle (2007). (2007, neutral): “Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006).”