Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services

By Sven Wunder. 2015

706 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7bc931aad3ae3fc8e615f1c455c581093a9b2cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

The PES Conceit: Revisiting the Relationship between Payments for Environmental Services and Neoliberal Conservation (2017, background): “(Wunder 2015:241)”
From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services (2018, background): “Second, we assessed whether there was any history of enforcing sanctions (for example, warnings, suspending payments, partially and/or temporarily, or permanently) when service providers had failed to comply, using three thresholds: (1) sanctions never applied, (2) infrequent or uncertain use and (3”
Wild Edible Fruits: A Systematic Review of an Under-Researched Multifunctional NTFP (Non-Timber Forest Product) (2019, background): “Further, NTFP and WEF extraction are usually part of larger, often diverse bundles of ecosystem services [25,39,215,216,223].”
The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services (2016, methodology): “Finally, some basic preconditions should be satisfied (Wunder, 2015).”
The Different Dimensions of Livelihood Impacts of Payments for Environmental Services (PES) Schemes: A Systematic Review (2018, background): “Certainly, the effectiveness and efficiency of PES are also a result of design choices (Engel et al., 2008; Wunder, 2015).”
The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services (2017, neutral): “Given the sustained interest in PES, much has been written about the potential benefits and pitfalls of payment-based approaches in environmental governance (Muradian et al., 2013; Wunder, 2013).”
Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework (2019, background): “…to channel money and/or inkind rewards (also called, often interchangeably, incentives and payments), to service “providers” who should in exchange implement practices that, in theory at least, would result in the increased provision of the desired services (Wunder, 2015; Sattler et al., 2013).”