The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services

429 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies (2018, neutral): “, payment for ecosystem services [31]), and support softer instruments, such as private standards and certification systems along global value chains [32].”
Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework (2019, background): “However, the sixth and last step in our causal sequence (Behavior long-term in the framework) posits that, after the end of the programme, we can expect conservation behaviour to get back either to pre-PES levels or even to a lower level (Andersson et al., 2018; Borner et al., 2017).”
Trade-offs between environment and livelihoods: Bridging the global land use and food security discussions (2017, neutral): “These multifunctional landscapes could also be supported by insertion into international commodity supply chains through the development of standards or other forms of payments for the environmental services provided by these landscapes and land uses (Rueda et al. 2015, Börner et al. 2017).”
Middle-range theories of land system change (2018, background): “, which can accommodate diverse combinations of labor and capital-based inputs– are available, and if land supply is restricted (Wunder, 2008; Börner et al., 2017).”