De-babelizing the language of innovation

By Jonathan D. Linton. 2009

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80aab2fac19b766a63a2fa963d10a0b0492f8953

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Rob P. J. M. Raven
2. Frank W. Geels
3. Chander K. Velu
4. Ron A. Boschma
5. C. Penna

In Strategy and Management

1. Rob P. J. M. Raven
2. Frank W. Geels
3. Chander K. Velu
4. H. El Bilali
5. Marko P. Hekkert
6. Johan Schot
7. D. Hess
8. Staffan Jacobsson

Citations in the corpus

• Innovation performance: The effect of knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in cross-country innovation ecosystems (2021, unknown): “Extant conceptions rely on input-output relationships to describe innovation performance (Linton, 2009), defining it as the outcome resulting from an innovation process comprising the development and implementation of innovation activities (Chen & Huang, 2009).”
• Antecedents and implications of disruptive innovation: Evidence from China (2015, unknown): “…innovation management literature (Abernathy and Clark, 1985; Adner, 2002, 2006; Calia et.al., 2007; Christensen, 2006; Christensen and Bower, 1996; Christensen and Raynor, 2003; Danneels, 2004; Govindarajan and Kopalle, 2006; Hall et. al., 2014; Kassicieh et.al., 2002; Linton, 2002, 2004, 2009).”
• Business model innovation and third-party alliance on the survival of new firms (2015, background): “Scholars have emphasized the importance of classifying the nature of innovation appropriately in order to understand its implications (see Linton, 2009).”
• Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination (2016, unknown): “Following the examples of Linton (2009), Ruddiman et al. (2015) and Lilienfeld et al. (2015), who in their respective fields offered guidance for use of terminology, the present paper issues cautions and recommendations for researchers and policymakers, urging usages that reduce rather than…”
• Socio-cognitive evolution in niche development: Comparative analysis of biogas development in Denmark and the Netherlands (1973–2004) (2010, background): “Markets, user preferences, and user competences may thus need to be coconstructed with new technologies (Leonard-Barton, 1988; Coombs et al., 2001; Oudshoorn and Pinch, 2003; Linton, 2009).”