Family ownership and firm performance: Influence of family management, family control, and firm size
By Wenyi Chu. 2011
310 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/805cfdaa0d13b5e50f868b759f9d93953d83e2c1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Ownership of Corporations (2016, background): “…is a positive effect on ROA in both emerging and advanced economies (e.g., Anderson & Reeb, 2003; Banalieva & Eddleston, 2011; Cai et al., 2012; Chu, 2011), revenue growth (Villalonga & Amit, 2006), and Tobin’s Q (e.g., Claessens, Djankov, Fan, & Lang, 2002; Tsao & Chen, 2012), while it…”
- Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant? (2011, background): “Through social relationships with managers and employees, family CEOs may help to obtain intangible resources such as goal congruence, trust, and social interactions, providing valuable, unique, and hard-to-imitate competitive advantages (Chu, 2011; Liu et al., 2011; Luo & Chung, 2005).”
- Family Involvement and Agency Cost Control Mechanisms in Family Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (2015, methodology): “We used seven items (a family member as the CEO, as the Managing Director, as a Divisional Director, as the CFO, as the Production Director, as the Sales Director and as the Supply Director; Chu 2009; Villalonga and Amit 2006): presence was coded as 1, whereas absence was coded as 0 (Cronbach’s α = ”