Ownership, Governance, and Bank Performance: Korean Experience

By Sunghoon Choi, Iftekhar Hasan. 2005

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/801f0516b0bcc22edac0a48598063564d8a55c9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

Citations in the corpus

The Effect of Board Size and Composition on the Efficiency of UK Banks (2011, background): “…governance (e.g. Amess and Drake, 2003; Berger and Mester, 1997; Isik and Hassan, 2003; Pi and Timme, 1993).3 Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, only two studies link board structure to bank efficiency, namely Pi and Timme (1993) for the United States, and Choi and Hasan (2005) for Korea.”
Ownership concentration and bank profitability (2017, unknown): “*, **, *** denote statistical significance at 10%, 5% and 1% levels. CI 1⁄4 cost to income ratio, representing cost efficiency. AQ 1⁄4 loan loss reserves to gross loan ratio, representing asset quality. TRC 1⁄4 total regulatory capital ratio, representing bank regulatory capital. EQTA 1⁄4 equity to ”
Board Diversity and Firm Performance: The Indonesian Evidence (2010, result): “The similar result is also indicated by Choi and Hasan (2005) using a sample of the Korean banks.”
Exploring the Nexus Between Human Capital, Corporate Governance and Performance: Evidence from Islamic Banks (2017, unknown): “In contrast, Choi and Hasan (2005) were unable to find any statistical significance between board independence and the performance of Korean banks.”
Directors' remuneration and performance in Australian banking (2007, unknown): “ROA and ROE are used widely to assess bank performance (see, for example, Knapp, Gart and Becher 2005, Choi and Hasan 2005, and Shen and 7 In unreported regressions, we tested the sensitivity of our results to the inclusion of other variables.”