Behaviour of temperate and sub-tropical reef fishes towards a stationary SCUBA diver

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cost-efficient sampling of fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects (2010, background): “A great advantage of methods based on remote stations is that they can be deployed in a range of depths and multiple systems can be used simultaneously to greatly improve efficiency in the field (Watson & Harvey 2007).”
Factors affecting the detection distances of reef fish: implications for visual counts (2011, background): “For the largest individuals, stationary point counts may be more appropriate (Jennings and Polunin 1995; Samoilys and Carlos 2000; Colvocoresses and Acosta 2007) provided the survey is effectively instantaneous since some species may be attracted by a stationary diver ( Watson and Harvey 2007; Ward”
Assessing reef fish assemblage structure: how do different stereo-video techniques compare? (2010, background): “Chapman et al. 1974; Chapman and Atkinson 1986; Watson and Harvey 2007 ).”
A comparison of two survey methods: differences between underwater visual census and baited remote underwater video (2010, unknown): “3), which is not surprising as diver-avoidance behaviour by these species has been documented elsewhere (e.g. Watson & Harvey 2007).”