Factors affecting the detection distances of reef fish: implications for visual counts
By Yves-Marie Bozec, Michel Kulbicki, F. Laloë, G. Mou-Tham, D. Gascuel. 2011
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ded6a0a6e4b16071f474632954cd0101b5a9ff2a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- S. R. Floeter
- Tony Dejean
- M. Hixon
- M. Harmelin-Vivien
- Jennifer O'Leary
- Serge Planes
- Emily S. Darling
- Yves Letourneur
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding and underwater visual census to monitor tropical reef fishes (2020, background): “However, besides logistical difficulties to organize underwater sampling in remote locations, UVC can suffer from several observer biases, such as overlooking cryptobenthic (Bozec et al., 2011) or wideranged species such as sharks (Juhel et al., 2018).”
- Distributions of Indo-Pacific lionfishes Pterois spp. in their native ranges : implications for the Atlantic invasion (2012, methodology): “This is a common method for evaluating reef-fish detectability (Kulbicki 1998, Kulbicki & Sarramégna 1999, Kulbicki et al. 2010, Bozec et al. 2011).”