Cost-efficient sampling of fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects

By T. Langlois, Euan Harvey, B. Fitzpatrick, J. Meeuwig, G. Shedrawi, D. Watson. 2010

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9070245773fb985f3a390d52222374111751ffbb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Molecular Biology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Bait type affects fish assemblages and feeding guilds observed at baited remote underwater video stations (2013, background): “While some BRUVS studies have targeted specific species such as snapper (Willis & Babcock 2000), the primary focus of many studies has been determination of the fish assemblage (e.g. Malcolm et al. 2007, Langlois et al. 2010).”
Habitat suitability for marine fishes using presence-only modelling and multibeam sonar (2010, background): “This feature is particularly important because of the often small sample sizes obtained from marine fish surveys (Langlois et al. 2010).”
A little bait goes a long way: The influence of bait quantity on a temperate fish assemblage sampled using stereo-BRUVs (2013, background): “Baited camera techniques are becoming a more common sampling technique for fish because of the potential to minimise observer biases and gear related selectivity (Cappo et al., 2004, 2007; Ellis and DeMartini, 1995; Harvey et al., 2007; Langlois et al., 2010; Malcolm et al., 2007; Murphy and Jenkins”
Underwater video techniques for observing coastal marine biodiversity: A review of sixty years of publications (1952–2012) (2014, methodology): “Several comparisons of underwater observation techniques 284 used stereo-video (Watson et al., 2005, 2010; Langlois et al., 2010).”
What is Big BRUVver up to? Methods and uses of baited underwater video (2017, methodology): “BRUVS have been compared to many other commonly-used techniques for assessing fish assemblages with the most common comparison being between BRUVS and Underwater Visual Census (UVC) (e.g. Stobart et al. 2007; Colton and Swearer 2010; Lowry et al. 2012) or Diver Operated Video (DOV) (Watson et al. 20”
A comparison of visual‐ and stereo‐video based fish community assessment methods in tropical and temperate marine waters of Western Australia (2013, methodology): “Importantly, the human capital and financial resources available to collect data must also be considered, as costs associated with different data collection techniques can vary substantially (Langlois et al. 2010).”