Biological measurements in a nationwide soil monitoring network

By Michiel Rutgers, A. J. Schouten, Jaap Bloem, N.J.M. van Eekeren, R.G.M. de Goede, G. J. O. Akkerhuis, A. Wal, C. Mulder, L. Brussaard, A. Breure. 2009

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f7f41cd1cdc3bdb721b8f4bc50aa3e019b5ef1b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The impact of agricultural practices on soil biota: A regional study (2013, methodology): “…programs in Europe, an 12 initiative stimulated byadoption of the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection by the European Union 13 (EC, 2006), and sets of biological indicators of soil quality were proposed, based on national programs 14 (Black et al., 2003; Rutgers et al., 2009; Keith et al., 2012).”
Biogeographical patterns of soil molecular microbial biomass as influenced by soil characteristics and management (2011, unknown): “…by local environmental filters such as soil properties or land use (Green et al., 2004; Horner-Devine et al., 2004; Fierer & Jackson, 2006; Martiny et al., 2006; Dequiedt et al., 2009; Rutgers et al., 2009) but also by more global parameters such as climatic factors (Drenovsky et al., 2010).”
Soil Degradation and Soil Quality in Western Europe: Current situation and future perspectives (2014, background): “highest numbers and arable land the lowest among non-natural sites) and soil type [75].”
Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits (2010, background): “However, such shortlists need further progress for other organisms, such as soil fauna (Faber 1991; Bradford et al. 2002; Rutgers et al. 2009), soil microbes (Heemsbergen et al.”
Selecting cost effective and policy-relevant biological indicators for European monitoring of soil biodiversity and ecosystem function (2016, background): “National (Gardi et al., 66 2009; Rutgers et al., 2009) and European (e.g. ENVASSO, Bispo et al. 2009) initiatives have been 67 undertaken to recommend indicators across Europe and elsewhere (Ditzler and Tugel, 2002; Black et 68 al., 2003; Turbé et al., 2010; Pulleman et al., 2012).”
Earthworms as Bioindicators of Soil Quality (2011, background): “Investigated biological parameters are earthworms, enchytraeids, springtails, mites, nematodes, and microorganisms, sampled in a 6-year cycle (Rutgers et al. 2009).”
Soil biodiversity and DNA barcodes: opportunities and challenges (2015, background): “For microbial DNA, significant progress toward standardization has been made in national surveys (Rutgers et al., 2009) and a unique ongoing study along a European transect.”
Connecting the green and brown worlds . allometric and stoichiometric predictability of above- and below-ground networks (2013, background): “…<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0035 <0.0001 0.0019 0.0002 Continued 119Connecting the Green and Brown Worlds Soil Quality Network (Mulder et al., 2011b; Rutgers et al., 2009), we recorded the occurrence of 258 soil invertebrates in agroecosystems under different types of land-use management, together…”
Soil biodiversity, biological indicators and soil ecosystem services—an overview of European approaches (2012, background): “Such references do not yet exist at a European scale, although density ranges for different groups of organisms have been published for a selection of soil and land use types in the Netherlands [31] and France [42].”