Selecting cost effective and policy-relevant biological indicators for European monitoring of soil biodiversity and ecosystem function

By B. Griffiths, J. Römbke, R. Schmelz, A. Scheffczyk, J. Faber, J. Bloem, G. Pérès, D. Cluzeau, A. Chabbi, M. Suhadolc and 29 more. 2016

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Soil-Related Sustainable Development Goals: Four Concepts to Make Land Degradation Neutrality and Restoration Work (2018, background): “To ensure a good quality SOM, it is probably easier to ensure proper soil biodiversity; a rich soil ecosystem almost always improves the quality of SOM, its interaction with the mineral parts of the soil, and the ecosystem functioning of soils [33].”
Integrating quantitative morphological and qualitative molecular methods to analyse soil nematode community responses to plant range expansion (2018, background): “Nematode communities might be among the best, most widely accepted and easiest to use indicators (Griffiths et al., 2016; Ritz, Black, Campbell, Harris, & Wood, 2009), but costs of whole- community nematode analyses constrain large- scale application.”