Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits

By Francesco de Bello, S. Lavorel, Sandra Díaz, R. Harrington, J. H. C. Cornelissen, R. Bardgett, M. Berg, P. Cipriotti, C. Feld, D. Hering and 7 more. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010

985 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Managing ecosystems to ensure the provision of multiple ecosystem services is a key challenge for applied ecology. Functional traits are receiving increasing attention as the main ecological attributes by which different organisms and biological communities influence ecosystem services through their effects on underlying ecosystem processes. Here we synthesize concepts and empirical evidence on linkages between functional traits and ecosystem services across different trophic levels. Most of the 247 studies reviewed considered plants and soil invertebrates, but quantitative trait–service associations have been documented for a range of organisms and ecosystems, illustrating the wide applicability of the trait approach. Within each trophic level, specific processes are affected by a combination of traits while particular key traits are simultaneously involved in the control of multiple processes. These multiple associations between traits and ecosystem processes can help to identify predictable trait–service clusters that depend on several trophic levels, such as clusters of traits of plants and soil organisms that underlie nutrient cycling, herbivory, and fodder and fibre production. We propose that the assessment of trait–service clusters will represent a crucial step in ecosystem service monitoring and in balancing the delivery of multiple, and sometimes conflicting, services in ecosystem management.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fc0d08125529c57fef308b8b6fd3ec8599a58948

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Francesco de Bello
  2. W. H. van der Putten
  3. S. Lavorel
  4. Wilfried Thuiller
  5. J. Lepš
  6. R. Bardgett
  7. N. Mason
  8. David A. Wardle

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Wilfried Thuiller
  2. Miguel B. Araújo
  3. Antoine Guisan
  4. S. Lavorel
  5. Francesco de Bello
  6. W. H. van der Putten
  7. Joaquín Hortal
  8. Jorge M. Lobo

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Francesco de Bello
  2. Wilfried Thuiller
  3. S. Lavorel
  4. Miguel B. Araújo
  5. Jorge M. Lobo
  6. J. Lepš
  7. Antoine Guisan
  8. Joaquín Hortal

Citations in the corpus