Exploratory study on the land area required for global food supply and the potential global production of bioenergy

By J. Wolf, Prem S. Bindraban, J. Luijten, L. Vleeshouwers. 2003

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e301f27562478dd9d3c626145844fb50feca821

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

1. André P. C. Faaij
2. I. Lewandowski
3. H. Lotze-Campen
4. S. Searle
5. A. Popp
6. Chris Malins
7. Martin K. van Ittersum
8. M. Brancourt‐Hulmel

In Ecology

1. I. Lewandowski
2. S. Searle
3. Xiaoping Liu
4. Chris Malins

In Environmental Engineering

1. Ottmar Edenhofer
2. Xiaoping Liu
3. Nico Bauer
4. H. Lotze-Campen
5. S. Searle
6. Shaojian Wang
7. Chris Malins
8. André P. C. Faaij

Citations in the corpus

• A reassessment of global bioenergy potential in 2050 (2015, methodology): “…such that even with a growing global population less rather than more cropland will be needed in the future to feed everyone (Wolf et al., 2003; Hoogwijk et al., 2005, 2009; Smeets et al., 2007; Field et al., 2008), leaving up to one half of the Earth’s land area (Wolf et al., 2003) available.”
• Long-term global availability of food: continued abundance or new scarcity? (2008, background): “Several studies have explored the global room for bio-energy while assuming crop yields up to some agronomic potential as well as and some socially desirable allocation of natural resources over food and energy crops (for example Hoogwijk et al. 2005; Smeets et al. 2005; Wolf et al. 2003).”
• The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system (2011, background): “On the contrary, the lowest biomass potential for 2050 [39] is based on a pessimistic scenario with high population growth, high food demands and extensive agricultural production systems.”
• A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects (2017, background): “Many previous studies (Bakker et al., 2005; Mendelsohn & Dinar, 1999; Wolf et al., 2003) have agreed that climate factors (e.”
• A bottom-up assessment and review of global bio-energy potentials to 2050 (2007, background): “[22], and which are from now on referred to as Hoogwijk and Wolf.”