The Roles of Entitativity and Essentiality in Judgments of Collective Responsibility

By Thomas F. Denson, Brian Lickel, Mathew Curtis, Douglas M. Stenstrom, D. Ames. 2006

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e22d92e59868b17374abeb334998a5ca13d1fe4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ying-yi Hong
2. Sheri R. Levy
3. Chi-Yue Chiu

In Social Psychology

1. Ying-yi Hong
2. Chi-Yue Chiu
3. Sheri R. Levy
4. Verónica Benet‐Martínez
5. Michael W. Morris
6. M. Verkuyten
7. Jennifer L. Aaker
8. LeeAnn M. Mallorie

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ying-yi Hong
2. Chi-Yue Chiu
3. Sheri R. Levy
4. Carol S. Dweck
5. Melanie Killen
6. Vivienne Y. K. Tao
7. LeeAnn M. Mallorie

Citations in the corpus

• Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations (2006, background): “Highly entitative groups also receive greater levels of collective responsibility for negative acts including murder (e.g. Denson et al., 2006; Lickel, Schmader, & Hamilton, 2003).”