The Femininity Ideology Scale: Factor Structure, Reliability, Convergent and Discriminant Validity, and Social Contextual Variation

By R. Levant, Katherine Richmond, S. Cook, A. Tanner House, Maryse Aupont. 2007

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e30a896ccee40819b221169db8bdee2ac88d7501

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Susan A. Gelman
2. Marina Epstein
3. E. Thompson
4. Kate Bennett
5. Andrew P. Smiler
6. M. Addis

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring Gender: Options and Issues (2010, background): “, 1982), and FIS (Levant et al., 2007), yet it also has its own large literature (see reviews by Calogero & Thompson, Volume II, Chapter 8; Grabe & Hyde, 2006; Roberts, Cash, Feingold, & Johnson, 2006; Ward & Harrison, in press).”
• Measurement of masculinity ideologies: A (critical) review. (2015, methodology): “The amended measure was revised into the MRNI-R (Levant et al., 2007) to address the lack of empirical support for the MNRI’s theorized structure (for a brief history of this measure, see Levant & Richmond, 2007).”
• Determinants of Gender Essentialism in College Students (2008, background): “Second, males report greater support for traditional gender roles and stereotype gender more strongly (Levant et al. 2007; Strough et al. 2007; Twenge, 1997a; Vogel et al. 2003), which suggests less flexibility and may be the result of the positioning of masculinity as natural.”