Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a Permanent and Inevitable Characteristic of the Third Sector

By Taco Brandsen, Wim van de Donk, Kim Putters. 2005

378 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7dff6916b5c3a0c0f0a34cf98e8fa5886aa4c031

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Fergus Lyon
2. Bob Doherty
3. H. Haugh
4. C. Mason
5. Vinciane Servantie
6. M. Hlady‐Rispal
7. Leandro Sepúlveda

In General Health Professions

1. Fergus Lyon
2. S. Osborne

In Sociology and Political Science

1. V. Pestoff
2. Taco Brandsen
3. H. Haugh
4. Bob Doherty
5. P. Karré
6. S. Osborne
7. M. Kitson
8. C. Mason

Citations in the corpus

• The Third Way and the Third Sector: New Labour's Economic Policy and the Social Economy (2007, background): “The public sector is the dominant employer in health, education and public administration ( Black et al., 2004 ) and employment has increased in education and health, particularly following the increase in public spending during New Labour’s second term.”
• Patterns of co-production in public services (2006, background): “As a consequence, systems of provision increasingly combine different mechanisms of co-ordination and different types of actors (elsewhere termed ‘the welfare mix’, see Brandsen et al. 2005; Evers 2005).”
• Volunteering. (2020, neutral): “Indeed, international scholarship has been pointing to a historically new process of institutional hybridization in the classical mixed welfare provision (Bode 2006; Brandsen et al. 2005).”
• Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2014, background): “Second, new models of public service delivery have created market opportunities for new entrants, including SEs (Bransden et al. 2005; Chell 2007; Evers 2005; Fawcett and Hanlon 2009; Haugh and Kitson 2007; Perrini et al. 2010).”
• Hybrid Organizations: No Cause for Concern? (2011, background): “Usually, they are either former state agencies set at arm's length ( Pollitt & Talbot, 2004 ) or organizations that originally emerged from civil society, were later incorporated into the public sector, and then became part of (quasi-) markets introduced as part of (new) public management reforms ( ”
• A Fair Trade-off? Paradoxes in the Governance of Fair-trade Social Enterprises (2016, background): “hybridity is often the cause of significant insights and emergent tensions (Battilana and Lee 2014; Brandsen et al. 2005; Doherty et al. 2014; Pache and Santos 2012).”