C-rater: Automated Scoring of Short-Answer Questions

By Claudia Leacock, Martin Chodorow. Computers and the Humanities, 2003

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7db946cc188802903ae54360d0914cbe7f655b41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

Citations in the corpus

Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next-Generation Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-14-10. (2014, methodology): “Liu et al. Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education and America’s Promise (LEAP; see Table 1). Although the definitions in various frameworks overlap, they also vary to a large degree in terms of the core features underlying critical thinking. In the first part of this paper, we review existi”
Retrieval-Based Learning: A Perspective for Enhancing Meaningful Learning (2012, methodology): “Similar scoring algorithms and software already exist (e.g., C-rater; Leacock and Chodorow 2003), but these algorithms have been developed and used almost exclusively for assessment purposes, not as tools to promote learning by active retrieval practice.”
SemEval-2013 Task 7: The Joint Student Response Analysis and 8th Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge (2013, background): “However, for the assessment of responses to short-answer questions (Leacock and Chodorow, 2003; Pulman and Sukkarieh, 2005; Nielsen et al., 2008a; Mohler et al., 2011) and in tutorial dialog systems (Graesser et al., 1999; Glass, 2000; Pon-Barry et al., 2004; Jordan et al., 2006; VanLehn et al.,…”
The Eras and Trends of Automatic Short Answer Grading (2015, methodology): “Another example is that research in ASAG has also been cast as a paraphrase recognition problem (Leacock and Chodorow 2003).”
Learning to Grade Short Answer Questions using Semantic Similarity Measures and Dependency Graph Alignments (2011, background): “…of CAA: grading essay responses, which includes checking the style, grammaticality, and coherence of the essay (Higgins et al., 2004), and the assessment of short student answers (Leacock and Chodorow, 2003; Pulman and Sukkarieh, 2005; Mohler and Mihalcea, 2009), which is the focus of this work.”
Text-to-Text Semantic Similarity for Automatic Short Answer Grading (2009, background): “…assessment: the grading of essays, which is done mainly by checking the style, grammati-cality, and coherence of the essay (cf. (Higgins et al., 2004)), and the assessment of short student answers (e.g., (Leacock and Chodorow, 2003; Pul-man and Sukkarieh, 2005)), which is the focus of this paper.”