ABJ triality: from higher spin fields to strings

By Chi-Ming Chang, Shiraz Minwalla, Tarun Sharma, Xi Yin. 2012

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We demonstrate that a supersymmetric and parity violating version of Vasiliev’s higher spin gauge theory in AdS4 admits boundary conditions that preserve N=0,1,2,3,4?> or 6 supersymmetries. In particular, we argue that the Vasiliev theory with U(M) Chan–Paton and N=6?> boundary condition is holographically dual to the 2+1 dimensional U(N)k × U(M)−k ABJ theory in the limit of large N, k and finite M. In this system all bulk higher spin fields transform in the adjoint of the U(M) gauge group, whose bulk t’Hooft coupling is M/N. Analysis of boundary conditions in Vasiliev theory allows us to determine exact relations between the parity breaking phase of Vasiliev theory and the coefficients of two and three point functions in Chern–Simons vector models at large N. Our picture suggests that the supersymmetric Vasiliev theory can be obtained as a limit of type IIA string theory in AdS4×CP3?>, and that the non-Abelian Vasiliev theory at strong bulk ’t Hooft coupling smoothly turn into a string field theory. The fundamental string is a singlet bound state of Vasiliev’s higher spin particles held together by U(M) gauge interactions. This is illustrated by the thermal partition function of free ABJ theory on a two sphere at large M and N even in the analytically tractable free limit. In this system the traces or strings of the low temperature phase break up into their Vasiliev particulate constituents at a U(M) deconfinement phase transition of order unity. At a higher temperature of order T=NM?> Vasiliev’s higher spin fields themselves break up into more elementary constituents at a U(N) deconfinement temperature, in a process described in the bulk as black hole nucleation. This article is part of a special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical devoted to ‘Higher spin theories and holography’.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7dacabf8dafe9ea8696f86e4f7ae6e88e14c9711

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Giombi
  2. I. Klebanov
  3. Rajesh Gopakumar
  4. M. Gaberdiel
  5. Xi Yin
  6. O. Aharony
  7. Eric Perlmutter
  8. E. D. Skvortsov

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Rajesh Gopakumar
  2. M. Gaberdiel
  3. S. Giombi
  4. Xi Yin
  5. O. Aharony
  6. E. D. Skvortsov
  7. Eric Perlmutter
  8. I. Klebanov

Citations in the corpus