After objectivity: an empirical study of moral judgment

By Shaun Nichols. 2004

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7da780d17b6bde08d34faf80df07d6d150acc384

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

Folk Moral Relativism (2011, background): “© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd For example, in a pioneering study, Nichols (2004) presented participants with a story about two individuals—John and Fred—who appeared to hold different moral views.”
What is moral reasoning? (2015, background): “…tomorality, such as whethermorality andmoral judgments are based in reasons and are rationally assessable, andwhether, andunderwhat conditions,moral judgments can be true (Cholbi, 2006; Haidt & Bjorklund, 2008a; Jones, 2006; Kennett & Fine, 2009; Nichols, 2002, 2004; Prinz, 2007; Roskies, 2003).”
The meta-ethical grounding of our moral beliefs: Evidence for meta-ethical pluralism (2013, background): “In addition, people of all ages have been found to make important distinctions between moral issues and other types of issues (Cullum & Wright, 2010; Killen & Nucci, 1995; Nichols, 2004; Nucci, 1981; Nucci & Turiel, 2000; Smetana, 1981, 1983; Turiel, 1983, 1998; Wainryb et al., 2001, 2004; Wright et”
Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy (2018, background): “However, helpful commentaries from readers, including Wesley Buckwalter, led us to revise our classification for Nichols (2004). data point).”
Do you know more when it matters less? (2010, unknown): “…Nahmias, Morris, Nadelhoffer, & Turner, 2006; Nichols & Knobe, 2007; Woolfolk, Doris, & Darley, 2006), philosophy of language (e.g., Machery, Mallon, Nichols, & Stich, 2004), ethics (e.g., Nichols, 2004), and epistemology (e.g., Swain, Alexander, & Weinberg, 2008; Weinberg, Nichols, & Stich, 2001).”
“Lean not on your own understanding”: Belief that morality is founded on divine authority and non-utilitarian moral judgments (2013, background): “…versus subjective foundation, that is, as having a truth-value that is either dependent or independent of human minds (see Goodwin & Darley, 2008, Nichols, 2004; though people tend to perceive certain classes of moral propositions as more objective than other classes; see Goodwin & Darley,…”