Do you know more when it matters less?

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy (2018, background): “For example, in experimental epistemology, the observation of negative results has led some to reach the substantive conclusion that practical stakes do not impact knowledge ascriptions (see for example Buckwalter, 2010; Feltz and Zarpentine, 2010; Rose et al., in press).”
Knowledge, Bets, and Interests (2012, background): “(Fantl and McGrath 2009, 99) In practice, what this means is that there can’t be a salient p , 𝜑 such that: • The agent is justified in believing p ; • The agent is not warranted in doing 𝜑 ; but • If the agent had more evidence for p , and nothing else, the agent would be be warranted in doing…”