Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction

By J. Rasmussen. 1986

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospects (2018, background): “These ideas pertain directly to how people understand machines, spanning simple devices, process control systems, complex computational systems, and intelligent systems (Bainbridge, 1979, 1988; de Kleer and Brown, 1983; Goodstein, Andersen and Olsen, 1988; Moray, 1987; Mueller & Klein, 2011; Rasmuss”
A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part II: Qualitative models and search strategies (2003, background): “There are two-dimensions along which abstraction at different levels is possible*/structural and functional (Rasmussen, 1986).”
Human error taxonomies applied to driving: A generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems (2009, background): “1 shows three levels of cognitive control, denoted as skill-based, rule-based, and knowledge-based, behaviour (Rasmussen, 1986).”
When mental models go wrong: co-occurrences in dynamic, critical systems (2004, background): “Often, errors must be seen as marginal events caused by the same mechanisms that generate correct actions most of the time (Rasmussen, 1986).”
L'analyse du travail en didactique professionnelle (2002, background): “Vergnaud (1992), issu de la mouvance piagétienne ; d'autre part, le courant de la psychologie du travail de langue française (Leplat, 2000), qui met particulièrement l'accent sur la dimension cognitive de l'activité professionnelle.”
Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology (2006, background): “The hierarchical and heterarchical relationships and interactions between structures and functions at different levels have certainly served human factors researchers well in the past (Wilson & Corlett, 1995Rasmussen, 1986; Salvendy, 1997; Singleton, 1989; Meister, 1989; Vicente, 1999).”
A Systems Approach to Investigating Child Abuse Deaths (2005, background): “The cornerstone of the paradigm shift for understanding error is to take human error as the starting point of an investigation, not as the ending (Rasmussen, 1986).”
Cognitive Control Dynamics for Reaching a Satisficing Performance in Complex Dynamic Situations (2007, background): “In the 1980s, many empirical results invalidated this position (Hirst, Spelke, Reaves, Caharack, & Neisser, 1980; Navon, 1979), and the idea of an indirect control or of a supervisory control of routine activities by controlled processes was gradually adopted (Norman, 1981; Rasmussen, 1986; Reason, ”
Designing for Flexible Interaction Between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control (2007, background): “…from reducing the human role in system control and problem solving (Amalberti, 1999; Bainbridge, 1983; Billings, 1997; Lewis, 1998; Parasuraman & Riley, 1997; Parasuraman et al., 2000; Rasmussen, 1986; Sarter et al., 1997; Satchell, 1998; Sheridan, 1992; Wickens et al., 1998; Wiener & Curry, 1980).”
Neuroergonomics: Research and practice (2003, background): “…problems in human–automation interaction have also been well documented, both in the laboratory and the field (Wiener and Curry 1980, Bainbridge 1983, Rasmussen 1986, Sheridan 1992, Billings 1997, Parasuraman and Riley 1997, Sarter et al. 1997, Lewis 1998, Satchell 1998, Parasuraman et al. 2000).”
Human-Automation Interaction (2005, methodology): “The EID approach also draws on the concept of the goals-means-ends abstraction hierarchy proposed by Rasmussen (1986) and on his taxonomy of skills, rules, and knowledge.”