Does gradual retirement have better outcomes than abrupt retirement? Results from an Australian panel study

By D. Vaus, Y. Wells, H. Kendig, S. Quine. Ageing & Society, 2007

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d4c6945c0a4365adc32d1c7ae6daf994940a53b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. J. Earl
2. J. Wong
3. A. McMunn

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Earl
2. A. McMunn

In General Health Professions

1. J. Earl
2. James Nazroo
3. M. Wahrendorf
4. E. Breeze

Citations in the corpus

• Participation in socially-productive activities, reciprocity and wellbeing in later life: baseline results in England (2009, background): “Results from an Australian panel study also suggest that control over the retirement process is more closely associated with wellbeing outcomes than the timing or manner of retirement (De Vaus et al. 2007).”
• Gradual Retirement, Sense of Control, and Retirees' Happiness (2009, background): “In terms of the work-retirement transition, individuals who retired voluntarily are happier than those who were forced out of their jobs (Calvo 2006; De Vaus et al. 2007; Gall, Evans, and Howard 1997; Gallo et al. 2006).”
• Towards an integrated model of individual, psychosocial, and organizational predictors of retirement adjustment (2009, background): “Personal choice and perceived control in the decision to retire have been linked to better adjustment (Calvo et al., 2007; de Vaus et al., 2007; Rosenman & Warburton, 1995).”