Social Capital and Community Governance

By Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis. 2002

1,600 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d448f56e3aba76cc43238189f6c5a66bdcb93c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

New evidence on wages and employment in worker cooperatives compared with capitalist firms (2009, positive): “First, daily workplace interactions could enhance reciprocity and internal solidarity between cooperativess’ members and employees, extending employment guarantees to non-member workers within WCs (Bowles and Gintis, 2002).”
Entrepreneurship and Social Capital (2007, background): “It must therefore be recognized that in certain contexts social capital may have a negative value (Bowles and Gintis, 2002).”
Social capital and soil conservation: evidence from the Philippines ∗ (2005, neutral): “ Bowles and Gintis (2002) cite experimental evidence from repeated plays of the Public Goods game that undermines the conventional self-interest assumption.”
Social Capital, Human Capital and the Community Mechanism: Toward a Conceptual Framework for Economists (2009, methodology): “In this paper, the term ‘community’ is used to cover the mechanism operated by these informal social organisations in general, following various traditions (Taylor, 1976, 1982; Hayami, 1989, 1997; Ostrom, 1997; Aoki and Hayami, 2001; Bowles and Gintis, 2002).”
The limits of self-governance when cooperators get punished: Experimental evidence from urban and rural Russia (2011, background): “6 See, for instance, Fehr and List (2004), Carpenter et al. (2005), Egas and Riedl (2008), Bellemare and Kröger (2007), and Carpenter and Seki (forthcoming) for recent studies that compared students to non-students within a given society.”
The Scope of Cooperation: Norms and Incentives (2007, background): “Bowles and Gintis (2000) have also formally studied the evolution of norms facilitating cooperation, but without relying on individual optimization.”
The Scope of Cooperation: Values and Incentives (2008, neutral): “The function N(Y 1 t ) intersects the function Y (nt) from left to right, as drawn in Figure 1, if NY 1 t < 1/Ynt, or, by (26), (30) and (31), if:”
Cooperation, trust, and social capital in Southeast Asian urban slums (2004, background): “The term is poorly defined because, to one set of researchers, social capital is defined as the propensities of individuals to trust, cooperate, and punish other individuals who act to establish and maintain prosocial norms of behavior (e.g., Fukuyama, 1995; Bowles and Gintis, 2002; Glaeser et al., ”