Energy Decisions and the Environment: A Guide to the Use of Multicriteria Methods

By Benjamin F. Hobbs, P. Meier. 2000

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c76f03c43a55f1de306089b2a6d50b442473e80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Michelle L. Bell
2. L. Greening
3. Thomas P. Seager
4. Igor Linkov
5. S. Bernow
6. Hugh Ellis
7. G. Kiker
8. Benjamin F. Hobbs

Citations in the corpus

• Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making (2004, methodology): “That is, MCDM models used to rank alternatives should be trustworthy and accurate reflections of decision makers’ values; unfortunately, many common MCDM methods cannot assure this (Hobbs and Meier, 2000).”
• Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making (2005, background): “…public policy (Keefer et al. 2002a, 2002b); climate change (Bell et al. 2003); industrial facility siting (Larichev and Olson 2001); energy policy (Hobbs and Meier 2000; Keefer et al. 2002a, 2002b); agricultural resource management (Hayashi 2000); and life-cycle assessment (Seppala et al. 2002).”
• An evaluation of multi-criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy (2001, methodology): “Similar questionnaires have been used previously to evaluate MCDM methods (e.g., Hobbs and Meier, 2000; Le !on, 1997; Zapatero et al., 1997).”