Design of coordinated energy and environmental policies: use of multi-criteria decision-making

By L. Greening, S. Bernow. 2004

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/208f2f733c70b9176a7e3cf181de3ae14467360d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Ocean Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Review of Alternative Methodologies for Analysing Off-Grid Electricity Supply (2012, methodology): “Each of these has been applied to energy and renewable energy issues – Greening and Bernow [42] point out the potential of MCDM in energy and environment studies, while Wang et al [119] present a recent review.”
Multi-criteria model for sustainable development using goal programming applied to the United Arab Emirates (2015, background): “Several literature reviews confirm the popularity of MCDM models (Wang et al., 2009; Greening and Bernow, 2004).”
A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development (2017, background): “Analysing the above works, a firm conclusion can be drawn that these models are best suited for finding priority setting of criteria available and deciding if the alternatives are relevant or irrelevant [111].”
State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods (2014, methodology): “Greening and Bernow (2004) applied the MCDM methods to design of Coordinated Energy and Environmental Policy; Moffett D ow nl oa de d by [ U ni ve rs ity o f T eh ra n] a t 0 4: 17 0 9 A pr il 20 14 and Sarkar (2006) – design of conservation area networks.”
Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives (2009, background): “The ranking is based on weighted summation of the scores on the different criteria (Greening and Bernow 2004; Dodgson et al. 2000; Munda et al. 1994), where for the results reported in this paper, the scores and the weights are based on expert judgment in order to be able to compare across various s”
Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: A literature review (2011, methodology): “Greening and Bernow (2004) referred to the potential of MCDM in energy and environmental policy planning [21].”
Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects (2011, methodology): “1 gives a summary of the various tools based on the levels of information on the decision-making environment and the nature of output results as described by Holt (1998) and Greening and Bernow (2004).”
An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology (2010, unknown): “There are many sophisticated analytical methods available with which to seek optimal solutions for multi-goal problems (Greening and Bernow, 2004).”