Review Histone Methylation: Dynamic or Static?
By Andrew J. Bannister, Robert Schneider, Tony Kouzarides. 2002
530 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c7329e26a713cbc045d082114af72fba9428022
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- How corticosteroids control inflammation: Quintiles Prize Lecture 2005 (2006, background): “Methylation of histones, particularly histone H3, by histone methyltransferases, usually results in gene suppression (Bannister et al., 2002).”
- The transcriptional repressor JHDM3A demethylates trimethyl histone H3 lysine 9 and lysine 36 (2006, background): “Until recently, histone lysine methylation was considered a stable modification 7,8 , but the identification of histone demethylase enzymes has demonstrated the reversibility of this epigenetic mark 9–11 .”
- The functions of E(Z)/EZH2-mediated methylation of lysine 27 in histone H3. (2004, background): “It is important to point out that, although the cell-cycle-dependent change in methyl marks is interesting, it raises a serious challenge to the current hypothesis that histone methylation is a mitotically heritable mark for epigenetic regulation [2,52].”
- The histone modification pattern of active genes revealed through genome-wide chromatin analysis of a higher eukaryote. (2004, background): “A similar restriction to transcribed regions has been observed in S. cerevisiae for H3-di- meK4 (Bernstein et al. 2002).”