YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture

By B. Harmer. 2010

957 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c4df29e2c5b7fa9c0538e96c6f9f37e728a6159

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

Citations in the corpus

What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint (2016, background): “Multiple forces shape its use: corporate strategies, programming cultures, public policy, user tactics and counter-tactics, morals, habits, rhetorics, and interfaces (Burgess and Green, 2009; Lievrouw, 2014; Van Dijck, 2013).”
Cultural Citizenship and Cosmopolitan Practice: Global Youth Communicate Online (2010, background): “Burgess and Green (2009) suggest that the video-sharing site YouTube could”
Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip (2019, background): “In practice, visibility is afforded by the platform in several ways; it is ‘constructed and shaped’ through ‘personalised and social algorithms for search and front page layout, algorithmic search, and features like auto-playing ‘related videos’’ (Burgess and Green, 2018: 53).”
Reliable Crowdsourcing and Deep Locality-Preserving Learning for Unconstrained Facial Expression Recognition (2019, background): “Although Internet users [1], [6], [36], [69] provide an abundant data source for unconstrained expressions, the complexity of emotion categories annotation has hindered the collection of large annotated databases.”
Forming digital self and parasocial relationships on YouTube (2016, neutral): “YouTube provides the ideal setting for digital-self presentation, allowing maximum control over the information disclosed (Burgess and Green, 2009; Cheung, 2000; Pace, 2008).”
Anxiety, panic and self-optimization (2018, background): “In 2007, Burgess and Green argued that the crux of YouTube’s community lays within its function as a social networking site, filled with short ‘quotes’ of content and reactions (Burgess and Green, 2007: 49).”
Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker (2013, background): “But it is not only experts who can now analyze digital traces on the Web—in many Web 2.0-friendly websites, metadata about viewing preferences, choices, and responses is constantly aggregated and displayed for all users to view (Benkler, 2006; Burgess & Green, 2009).”
“It Gets Better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity (2016, background): “This combination produces a form adhering to features of amateur or semi-amateur genres such as video-blogs (vlogs) or other home-made videos (Burgess, 2007; Burgess and Green, 2009), thus reinforcing the sense of authenticity embedded in the initiating video.”
‘I Guess A Lot of People See Me as a Big Sister or a Friend’: the role of intimacy in the celebrification of beauty vloggers (2017, background): “– Zoe Sugg, The Creators In broad terms, the unprecedented success of YouTubers like Zoe Sugg highlights the capacity for new media technologies to grant, and facilitate, fame in the twenty-first century through ‘the commercialization of amateur content’ (Burgess & Green, 2009, pp. 23, 24).”
Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? (2017, background): “YouTube allows content to be shared, embedded and discussed (Burgess & Green, 2013).”
Algorithmic Cultures : Essays on Meaning, Performance and New Technologies (2016, background): “…2015; Jenkins 2006; Havens, Lotz, and Tinic 2009), and how social media platforms increasingly play that role (Gillespie 2010; van Dijck 2013; Burgess and Green 2013, Vaidhyanathan; Sandvig 2015, Napoli 2015); the dynamics of cultural production that shape content (Peterson and Anand 2004;…”