Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion : A functional analysis

By Simona Negro, Marko P. Hekkert, Ruud E. H. M. Smits. 2007

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c3a617d270f707b21611f67f54202a5356db4a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology (2013, background): “Biogas technology has repeatedly been analyzed by scholars in the field of innovation studies (Decker et al., 2007; Geels and Raven, 2006, 2007; Markard et al., 2009; Negro et al., 2007; Negro and Hekkert, 2008; Raven, 2004; Raven and Geels, 2010; Raven and Gregersen, 2007).”
The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system (2009, background): “Foxon et al., 2005; Jacobsson and Bergek, 2004; Jacobsson and Johnson, 2000; Negro et al., 2007 ).”
Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands (2009, background): “For a large part such empirical validation has been provided, for instance, in studies by Negro, Alkemade and colleagues [23,24,31].”
Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers (2008, methodology): “Suurs, R. and Hekkert, M.P. (2006): Biofuels implementation in the Netherlands 1990-2005: Assessing the dynamic features of a technological trajectory with the Innovation Systems approach, submitted to Energy Policy UNDP (2000): “World Energy Assessment.”
‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems (2008, unknown): “Jacobsson and Bergek 2004 ; Negro, Hekkert, and Smits 2007 ).”
Social Innovation and the Energy Transition (2018, background): “This also pertains to existing institutions, that often impede the development and diffusion of promising sustainable energy innovations [15,16].”
Market dynamics, innovation, and transition in China's solar photovoltaic (PV) industry: A critical review (2017, background): “Few previous studies have decomposed the industry supply chain [35-37], and such an analysis may be of great importance in China’s PV industry.”
The impact of the EU ETS on the sectoral innovation system for power generation technologies - Findings for Germany (2010, background): “The innovation system approaches applied by these energyrelated studies vary, but studying the functions of emerging technological innovation systems within the technological innovation system framework has become prominent (Hekkert et al., 2007a; Hekkert et al., 2007b; Negro et al., 2007).”
Market Formation in Technological Innovation Systems—Diffusion of Photovoltaic Applications in Germany (2011, background): “…level (Jacobsson and Johnson, 2000; Carlsson et al., 2002; Hekkert et al., 2007; Bergek et al., 2008; Markard and Truffer, 2008) and with empirical studies, often in the context of renewable energy technologies (inter alia Jacobsson and Bergek, 2004; Jacobsson et al., 2004; Negro et al., 2007).”
Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims (2009, methodology): “Recently a number of case studies [27,28,41] have been done that have adopted a different method; the socalled process method.”
Sustainability Entrepreneurship and Equitable Transitions to a Low-Carbon Economy (2006, background): “…may be legally chartered as either for-profit or non-profit entities, but they operate based on earned income in a market environment. activities interact with other functions to give rise to virtuous cycles of innovation are only beginning to be explored (Negro et al. 2007; Foxon et al. 2008).”