Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers

By Anna Bergek, Marko P. Hekkert, Staffan Jacobsson. 2008

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/330702f4a473a5cdb2c47107286c39a66196533e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy (2018, background): “Furthermore, the selection and concrete design of instruments ex ante is an issue, as the right level and timing of support on the demand side has been shown to be a real challenge, often leading to deadweight loss and limited effects of public investment, as has been shown for subsidies for thermal”
From lagging to leading? Technological innovation systems in emerging economies and the case of Chinese wind power (2013, methodology): “Technological advancement can also be analysed with learning curves (Bergek et al., 2008a).”
National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: a critical review of the literature (2015, background): “Asmentionedpreviously, thefirst of thesewas the technology systems approach proposed by Carlsson and Stankiewicz (1995) which begins with a particular technology and looks at what actors and institutions influence its development and diffusion (Bergek et al.”
The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech (2015, methodology): “The TIS approach aims to study innovation at the level of a technological field, and it has been argued that TIS ‘may have a geographical dimension, but are often international in dimension’ (Bergek et al., 2008b: p. 409).”
Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? (2009, background): “…model involves analysis of a range of system functions for assessing their performance, and has been applied to study dynamics of environmental innovation in the energy sector (Bergek et al., 2006; Hekkert et al., 2007; Jacobsson and Bergek, 2004; see also the contribution of Markard et al., 2009).”
Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda (2017, unknown): “under the heading of technological innovation systems (TIS) (Hekkert et al., 2007; Bergek et al., 2008).”
The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system (2009, background): “However, if particular system functions are inadequately addressed by the components of the system, a negative (vicious) cycle may be set off (Bergek et al., 2006).”
The Role of Trials and Demonstration Projects in the Development of a Sustainable Bioeconomy (2017, background): “Hellsmark [16] applies in his thesis the technological innovation system approach with the focus on the different functions of such systems [8,9,19] in his analysis of the role of system builders in realising the potential of second-generation transportation fuels from biomass.”
Innovation policy: What, why, and how (2017, background): “Subsequently, the provision of these various factors, which are often seen as complementary, has in the innovation-systems literature invariably been labelled functions, processes, or activities (Edquist, 2004; Bergek et al. , 2008 a ; Hekkert and Negro, 2009; Weber and Truffer, 2017, this issue).”
Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis (2008, background): “In this paper, we focus on technological innovation systems (TIS) (Bergek et al., 2007a), i.e. socio-technical systems focused on the development, diffusion and use of a particular technology (in terms of knowledge, product or both).”
Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research (2013, background): “…of adopting a new technology even if it does not perform as well as established technologies with regards to other performance attributes (Adner and Levinthal, 2001), since the advantages of the new technology are valued higher than its disadvantages (e.g. in terms of cost) (Bergek et al., 2008).”