‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems

By Anna Bergek, Staffan Jacobsson, Björn A. Sandén. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2008

451 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys (2008, methodology): “Bergek, Jacobsson, and Sandén (2008) therefore argue that ‘packs of entrepreneurs’ from different innovation journeys may collectively engage in institutional entrepreneurship.”
The effects of climate policy on the rate and direction of innovation: a survey of the EU ETS and the electricity sector (2012, background): “Therefore, to avoid a lock-out of new non-emitting technologies and allow for increasing spillover effects within the attached technology clusters (Bergek et al., 2008; Lim et al., 2003), additional technology-specific demand-pull policies are called for (Azar and Sandén, 2011; Jacobsson and Bergek,”
The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms (2015, methodology): “Bergek et al., 2008b), a strategic perspective on system building (Hellsmark and Jacobsson, 2009; Musiolik and Markard, 2011; Musiolik et al., 2012), international ties within TIS (Bento and Fontes, 2015; Binz et al., 2014), and suggestions for the analysis of TIS contexts (Bergek et al., 2015;…”
Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems (2016, background): “The approach of technological innovation systems has been discussed elsewhere in elaborate terms (Bergek et al., 2008a; Hekkert et al., 2007 There is some confusion in the TIS literature as to how functions relate to structures.”