fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception.

By Richard N. Henson, MR Fine-Goulden, R. J. Dolan. 2004

498 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Theory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem (2013, neutral): “For example, although both the FFA and the STS face area show repetition suppression when the identity of a face is repeated, only a more anterior STS region shows a reduced response when the emotional expression is repeated across different faces (Winston et al., 2004).”
Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: An fMRI Study (2010, unknown): “Subjects pressed a button whenever they saw two identical pictures in a row (1-back task) in the localizer scan, and in the experimental scan they fixated on a black dot continuously present in the center, and passively viewed stimuli displayed in a pseudorandom order.”
Separate Coding of Different Gaze Directions in the Superior Temporal Sulcus and Inferior Parietal Lobule (2007, unknown): “Together with other fMRIadaptation research [7, 13], our study supports the componential nature of face perception with different functional and neural mechanisms underlying the representation of gaze (STS) and facial identity (posterior fusiform gyrus) [14].”
fMRI of the face-processing network in the ventral temporal lobe of awake and anesthetized macaques. (2011, background): “However, STS in humans is involved inprocessingofgazedirectionandexpression as well (Puce et al., 1998; Winston et al., 2004), suggesting functional similarity between humans and monkeys.”
Distributed Neural Systems for Face Perception (2011, methodology): “The more familiar faces also evoked a stronger response in the posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus (PCC/PC) (Gobbini et al., 2004 ; Leibenluft et al., 2004 ).”
Different Neural Mechanisms within Occipitotemporal Cortex Underlie Repetition Suppression across Same and Different-Size Faces (2012, unknown): “Repetition suppression (RS) (or functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation) refers to the reduction in blood oxygen level-dependent signal following repeated presentation of a stimulus.”
Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions (2011, unknown): “, the eyes and the mouth), including facial expression processing (Winston et al., 2004; Andrews and Ewbank, 2004; Engell and Haxby, 2007; Said et al., 2010), gaze discrimination (Hoffman and Haxby, 2000; Pelphrey et al.”
Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression (2005, background): “, and functional imaging studies show that the perception of facial identity and facial expression have different neural correlate”
Activity in the human brain predicting differential heart rate responses to emotional facial expressions (2005, unknown): “Selection of faces to control for expression intensity and quality and ensure near 100% recognition accuracy was determined at behavioral piloting in nine control subjects prior to the study of Winston et al. (2004).”
Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area (2005, background): “FFA engagement seems to be automatic when presented with any face, neutral or expressive, and to involve both person detection processes as well as person identification processes (Grill-Spector et al., 2004; Winston et al., 2004).”
Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness (2006, background): “…et al., 2005; Rhodes et al., 2003, 2004; Webster et al., 2004) reflect changes in the responses of neurons that code faces (Loffler et al., 2005; Winston et al., 2004) and cannot be explained by retinal adaptation because they are robust to changes in the size and retinal location of the…”
Multisensory visual–tactile object related network in humans: insights gained using a novel crossmodal adaptation approach (2009, background): “Furthermore, Wittenberg et al. (2004) show enhanced connectivity between primary somatosensory cortex and primary visual cortex in early blind subjects.”
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. (2006, background): “46], object format [36], perceived shape [79], contour completion [48] and face representation [7, 80 ,81].”
Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About (2006, background): “Behavioral studies [4] show that familiarity does not aid expression reportability; functional brain imaging [ 87 ] has identified distinct brain areas for identity versus expression; braininjured patients [81], [92] have provided examples of selective impairments in identity or expression processin”