Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression

By Andrew J. Calder, Andrew W. Young. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2005

994 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2883809d3e78747ba9e5533b4aabf6effc1fe398

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

An investigation of basic facial expression recognition in autism spectrum disorders (2008, methodology): “Neuropsychological models of face processing in typical development have proposed that the structural encoding of facial identity and facial expressions use a shared specialised cognitive strategy (Bruce & Young, 1986 ; Calder & Young, 2005 ; Haxby, Hoffman, & Gobbini, 2000 ).”
The neural dynamics of updating person impressions. (2013, background): “…al., 2004a; Pelphrey et al., 2006) and facial expressions (static: Haxby et al., 2000; Hoffman and Haxby, 2000; Adolphs, 2002; LaBar et al., 2003; Calder and Young, 2005; by guest on M ay 23, 2016 http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/ D ow nloaded from Engell and Haxby, 2007; Ishai, 2008; dynamic:…”
Distributed Neural Systems for Face Perception (2011, background): “We explored how the distinct responses to faces and other object categories were, in fact, organized, leading to the development of multivariate pattern (MVP) analysis and understanding the response to faces in ventral temporal cortex as a distributed population code (Haxby et al., 2001 ).”
Different Neural Mechanisms within Occipitotemporal Cortex Underlie Repetition Suppression across Same and Different-Size Faces (2012, background): “…incorporating the midlateral fusiform gyrus (FFA) involved in processing facial identity, and the other incorporating the posterior superior temporal sulcus involved in processing facial expression—although see Calder and Young (2005) and Calder (2011) for evidence against such a clear distinction.”
Facial Expression Recognition by De-expression Residue Learning (2018, background): “, neutral expression) of the same subject [4] [5] [10].”
Social Psychological Face Perception: Why Appearance Matters. (2008, neutral): “One is the dual process model that differentiates mechanisms for the perception of identity versus the perception of emotion and other changeable facial qualities (Bruce & Young, 1986; Haxby, Hoffman, & Gobbini, 2002; but see Calder & Young, 2005).”
Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database (2010, background): “We thank Job van der Schalk for his help as a FACS specialist. recognition, and robotics (e.g., Calder & Young, 2005; Grossmann & Johnson, 2007; Rule, Ambady, Adams & Macrae, 2008; Schwaninger, Wallraven, Cunningham, & Chiller-Glaus, 2006).”
Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions (2011, neutral): “We found a main effect of category (F (1, 10) = 136, p b 0.001) demonstrating a larger overall response to faces than to objects.”
Real World Applications (2019, neutral): “(Tranel, Damasio, & Damasio, 1988; Calder, Young, Rowland, Perrett, Hodges, & Etcoff, 1996; Humphreys, Donnell, & Riddoch, 1993;Calder & Young, 2005).”
Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. (2007, background): “The face-responsive region in the STS is nvolved more in the representation of dynamic features of faces but see also Calder & Young, 2005).”
Gaze Cueing of Attention (2007, background): “…separate systems to those that involve analysis of invariant features (e.g., identity and gender; Andrews & Ewbank, 2004; Bruce & Young, 1986; Haxby et al., 2002; Hoffman & Haxby, 2000; but see Calder & Young, 2005, for arguments that suggest that the issue is not by any means settled).”
Mechanisms of face perception. (2008, background): “A recent review has challenged the Bruce and Young model, arguing that changeable aspects and invariant identity may instead be processed together and rely on partially overlapping visual representations (Calder & Young 2005).”
Sensitivity to genuine versus posed emotion specified in facial displays (2010, result): “This finding is consistent with many previous findings from behavioural and imaging research that suggests the ability to identify facial displays, as investigated by traditional facial expression recognition tasks, is an emotion-specific skill (see Calder & Young, 2005 ; Vuilleumier & Pourtois, 2”