The Silence of the Senses

By Charles Travis. 2004

431 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bbae31981ffcdb08cea24900e2113bd5310444b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ned Block
2. B. Brewer
3. Susanna Schellenberg
4. Kathrin Glüer
5. Michael Rescorla
6. Adam Pautz
7. Greg Janzen
8. J. Stazicker

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Susanna Schellenberg
2. Adam Pautz
3. Kathrin Glüer
4. Greg Janzen
5. Ned Block
6. B. Brewer
7. Michael Rescorla
8. James Genone

In Philosophy

1. Susanna Schellenberg
2. Kathrin Glüer
3. Adam Pautz
4. Greg Janzen
5. B. Brewer
6. Michael Rescorla
7. Ned Block
8. James Genone

Citations in the corpus

• Subjective Consciousness: A Self-Representational Theory (2009, background): “Apparently he’s unaware, unimpressed, or simply undaunted by the various objections that have been leveled against this view of perception (e.g., Alston, 2005; Brewer, 2006; Dewey, 1929; Travis, 2004).”
• Perception and Content (2006, background): “The error in illusory cases lies in the fact that such objects have the power to mislead us, in virtue of their perceptually relevant similarities with other things (see also Travis, 2004).”
• In Defence of a Doxastic Account of Experience (2009, background): “not have representational content (as found, for instance, in Campbell 2002, Martin 2002, Travis 2004,”
• The particularity and phenomenology of perceptual experience (2010, background): “5 McGinn (1982) , Davies (1992), Tye (1995), Lycan (1996), Byrne (2001), and Pautz (forthcoming) among others have defended views that are committed to these three theses.”
• Bayesian Perceptual Psychology (2015, background): “The relational view of perception Brewer (2007), Campbell (2010), Martin (2004), and Travis (2004) espouse a relational view of perception.”
• Why explain visual experience in terms of content (2010, background): “For recent skepticism about the case for the intentional view, see Burge (2003) and Travis (2004).”
• Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique (2016, neutral): “… and  most  of  his   principal  nonconceptualist  opponents  take  for  granted  that  perception  should  be  conceived  as  supplying   us  with  contents,  but  in  the  past  decade  there  have  been  important  challenges  to  this  idea  (see,  e.g.,  Travis   2004,  Brewer  2006).”
• Seeing‐As in the Light of Vision Science (2014, background): “Direct realists often claim, on a priori grounds, that representations in perception are all sub-personal (Travis 2004, p. 59).”