Perception and Content

By B. Brewer. 2006

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/480143b869cef22c63fd0e920bf4526aa2c8a4bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Adam Pautz
2. Susanna Schellenberg
3. Kathrin Glüer
4. Jeff Speaks
5. Greg Janzen
6. James Genone

In Philosophy

1. Susanna Schellenberg
2. Kathrin Glüer
3. Jeff Speaks
4. Adam Pautz
5. Greg Janzen
6. James Genone

Citations in the corpus

• In Defence of a Doxastic Account of Experience (2009, background): “Brewer 2008 ); for very instructive recent discussion see Siegel 2005.”
• The particularity and phenomenology of perceptual experience (2010, background): “Versions of this view have been defended by Campbell (2002), Martin (2002), and Brewer (2006) among others.”
• Perceptual Content Defended (2011, background): “his “naı̈ve realism”, while Brewer (2006) calls his the “object view”.”
• Transparency, Intentionalism, and the Nature of Perceptual Content (2009, background): “While each of these views is popular, there are apparent tensions between them, and some have thought that 3 For examples, see Chapter 6 of Campbell (2002), Travis (2004), Alston (2005), Brewer (2006), and the discussion of semantic and stative conceptions of representation in Martin (2002).”
• Subjective Consciousness: A Self-Representational Theory (2009, background): “Apparently he’s unaware, unimpressed, or simply undaunted by the various objections that have been leveled against this view of perception (e.g., Alston, 2005; Brewer, 2006; Dewey, 1929; Travis, 2004).”
• Additive Theories of Rationality: A Critique (2016, unknown): “… and  most  of  his   principal  nonconceptualist  opponents  take  for  granted  that  perception  should  be  conceived  as  supplying   us  with  contents,  but  in  the  past  decade  there  have  been  important  challenges  to  this  idea  (see,  e.g.,  Travis   2004,  Brewer  2006).”
• Why explain visual experience in terms of content (2010, background): “ter of experience as a given” See also Brewer (2006). It is unclear what he means—maybe that it violates”