Q methodology: A sneak preview

By J. Exel, G. Graaf. 2005

653 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7b9d98baaf3cfa4a3f556163a9eb745ddde3e28a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. R. Berry
2. Paul Stephens
3. I. T. Ellingsen
4. Ingunn Størksen

Citations in the corpus

• Q methodology in social work research (2010, result): “A similar structure is also found in other literature on Q (see Brown, 1991 /1992; Previte, Pini, & Haslam‐McKenzie, 2007 ; van Exel & de Graaf, 2005 ).”
• PRESERVICE AND EARLY CAREER TEACHERS' ATTITUDES TOWARD INCLUSION, INSTRUCTIONAL ACCOMMODATIONS, AND FAIRNESS: THREE PROFILES (2010, methodology): “Q-method, a rigorous qualitative research technique ( Donner, 2001 ), assumes that “only a limited number of distinct viewpoints exists on any topic” ( Van Exel & de Graff, 2005 , p.”