An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development

By Heather Tallis, P. Kareiva, M. Marvier, Amy A. Chang. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008

768 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Materials Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32a82381386336488523150de576647d7056a014

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Win-win scenarios at the climate–development interface: Challenges and opportunities for stove replacement programs through carbon finance (2012, neutral): “that only 16% of projects made major progress on both objectives (Tallis et al., 2008).”
Ethical Considerations in On-Ground Applications of the Ecosystem Services Concept (2012, background): “…by widely read scientific publications and international initiatives, such as the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA 2005) and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB; Kumar 2010), and by increasing on-ground application of ES-related policy instruments (e.g., Tallis et al. 2008).”
Conservation of species interaction networks (2010, background): “Recently, conservation science has shifted its focus from strictly preserving species diversity, to also considering the provision of vital ecosystem services and human welfare in general (e.g. Dobson et al., 2006; Armsworth et al., 2007; Kareiva et al., 2007; Tallis et al., 2008).”
Pollination services from field-scale agricultural diversification may be context-dependent (2015, background): “While conservation and ecosystem service outcomes can be synergistic, win–win scenarios are challenging to achieve (Naidoo et al., 2008; Tallis et al., 2008).”
Remote Sensing of Mangrove Ecosystems: A Review (2011, background): “Also, major non-governmental organizations, including the Nature Conservancy, the World Wildlife Fund, and the World Resource Institute, have begun piloting ecosystem services programs, as have major intergovernmental agencies, including the United Nation Development Program and the World Bank [168]”
What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries (2016, background): “Over the past decade, conservation scholars and practitioners have developed conceptual frameworks for understanding and quantifying human well-being [31, 32, 66] and others that emphasis social effects from an ecosystem services perspective [48].”
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes (2010, background): “At the same time, enhancing one service, such as improving nutrient retention through the promotion of vegetated riparian zones, can also enhance landscape beauty, wind protection, water quality, biodiversity, and crop production, increasing the benefits provided to society (4, 12).”
Watershed services of tropical forests: from hydrology to economic valuation to integrated analysis (2009, neutral): “is an act of faith’’ [12].”
Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs (2012, background): “Much work has focused on trying to capture relationships though the development of ‘production’ and ‘value’ functions (e.g. Daily and Matson, 2008; Kienast et al., 2009; Tallis et al., 2008; Tallis and Polasky, 2009), that model the link between ecosystem service”
From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments (2014, background): “This task is challenging because ecosystem services have complex flow dynamics that operate across differing spatial and temporal scales (Ruhl et al. 2007, Tallis et al. 2008, Fisher et al. 2009, Johnson et al. 2012, Bagstad et al. 2013).”
Assessing community-based conservation projects: A systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes (2013, methodology): “In fact, three of the four project design hypotheses (H-PD1, -PD-3, and -PD4) were supported to some degree, consistent with previous reviews emphasizing the importance of (a) building local institutional capacity [16] and training and skills development [15,22], (b) equitable distribution of benefi”
Mainstreaming ecosystem services through reformed European agricultural policies (2012, background): “However, development of appropriate indicators for monitoring services provision and of valuation methods to determine premium levels is only just beginning, in particular for many cultural ecosystem services (Wätzold & Schwerdtner 2005; Tallis et al. 2008).”