Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments—a survey

By Till Requate. 2005

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7af9a83d812abbed3f7fc5b375625cd5688f5b1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The Economics of Solar Electricity (2013, background): “While the literature has argued about the relative benefits of the two directions, the consensus is that both have an important role to play and should exist simultaneously (Mowery & Rosenberg, 1979; Grübler et al., 1999; Norberg-Bohm, 1999; Requate, 2005; Horbach, 2007).”
The impact of the EU ETS on the sectoral innovation system for power generation technologies - Findings for Germany (2010, background): “The seminal economic theory for the analysis of the innovation effects of environmental regulation is environmental economics (Jaffe et al., 2002; Requate, 2005).”
Stimulating Different Types of Eco-Innovation in the UK: Government Policies and Firm Motivations (2011, background): “…see Regulatory Push as the main driver of eco-innovation and often suggest that market-based instruments are superior to command and 6 control policies in reducing pollution due to cost-efficiency and flexibility advantages 5 (Milliam and Prince, 1989; Requate and Unold, 2003; Requate, 2005).”
The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System — Findings of company case studies in the German power sector (2011, background): “…innovation incentives provided by economic instruments and thus their superiority in spurring innovation (Jaffe et al., 2002; Popp et al., 2009; Requate, 2005; Vollebergh, 2007).5 The existing literature on the innovation impact of the EU ETS can be differentiated into studies trying to…”
Market-Based Emissions Regulation and Industry Dynamics (2016, methodology): “We extend the dynamic oligopoly framework developed in Ryan (2012) as the foundation for our analysis.”
A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature (2018, background): “Scholars have applied integral conceptualizations to study the effect of governmental policies on adoption by focusing on the nexus between technology and environmental policies [179-182] and on the nexus between incentive- and prescriptiveoriented policy instruments [183, 184].”
German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions (2012, unknown): “Moreover, marketbased instruments perform better than standards in providing incentives for firms 1 to adopt advanced abatement technology and to develop such new technology (Requate 2005).”
Does more stringent environmental regulation induce or reduce technology adoption? When the rate of technology adoption is inverted u-shaped (2012, background): “…diffusion presumably lowers the aggregate marginal abatement cost function” (p. 54), and this assumption is also made by Milliman and Prince (1989), Jung et al. (1996), Goulder and Schneider (1999), Fischer et al. (2003), Requate and Unold (2001, 2003), Rosendahl (2004), Requate (2005b) and others.”
A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis (2016, unknown): “Requate (2005), in particular, presents a review of the existing literature on the effects of different policy designs on innovation performance.”
The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? (2011, background): “Requate and Unold (2003) and Requate (2005) provided a comprehensive review on the theoretical inquiries on the incentives for adoption and development (including R&D) of innovations provided by environmental policy.”