[22] Detecting and overcoming crystal twinning.
By Todd O. Yeates. 1997
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Robbie P. Joosten
- Pavel V. Afonine
- Jane S. Richardson
- B. Hintze
- Christopher J. Williams
- Paul D. Adams
- T. Croll
- Vincent B. Chen
Citations in the corpus
- Introduction to twinning. (2003, background): “The review by Yeates (1997) will be of particular interest to macromolecular crystallographers.”
- A statistic for local intensity differences: robustness to anisotropy and pseudo-centering and utility for detecting twinning. (2003, background): “In certain space groups, a specimen may grow so that it is composed of distinct crystal domains whose orientations are crystallographically distinct, but whose reciprocal lattices are superimposed (Buerger, 1960; Donnay & Donnay, 1974; Yeates, 1997); this is referred to as hemihedral twinning.”
- A New Generation of Crystallographic Validation Tools for the Protein Data Bank (2011, background): “A number of tests have been developed to detect possible twinning from the distributions of intensities (Yeates, 1997; Padilla and Yeates, 2003).”
- Computational Methods for RNA Structure Validation and Improvement. (2015, background): “Twinning is noted in the wwPDB validation report; it can be dealt with fairly well in refinement (Yeates, 1997; Zwart, GrosseKunstleve, & Adams, 2005), but there is still less information content than”
- Model validation: local diagnosis, correction and when to quit (2018, background): “…around 1990 after two high-profile chain mis-tracings, and started with Rfree (Brünger, 1992), bond lengths and angles (Engh & Huber, 1991), twinning (Yeates, 1997), and the multi-criterion systems of PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1993), OOPS (Jones et al., 1991) and WHATCHECK (Hooft et al., 1996).”