Polylingual Languaging Around and Among Children and Adolescents
By J. Jørgensen. 2008
607 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a6bc9846b8b01d69eee180d7f657f789c360fba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Kate Menken
- E. Otsuji
- Jannis Androutsopoulos
- E. Piccardo
- J. MacSwan
- J. Jenkins
- A. Pennycook
- W. Baker
Citations in the corpus
- Translanguaging: Definitions, Implications, and Further Needs in Burgeoning Inquiry (2017, neutral): “Characterizing the communication of transnational individuals, Jørgensen (2008) uses the term polylingual languaging for the way “language users”
- Emergent bilingual students in secondary school: Along the academic language and literacy continuum (2013, background): “…(Council of Europe 2000), third spaces (Gutiérrez 2008), metrolingualism (Otsuji & Pennycook 2010; Pennycook 2010), fluid lects (Auer 1999), heterography (Blommaert 2008), hybrid language practices (Gutiérrez, BaquedanoLópez & Tejeda 1999), and poly-lingual languaging (Jørgensen 2008).”
- A Multilingual Perspective on Translanguaging (2017, background): “Similar proposed terms, each used a bit differently, include heteroglossia (Bakhtin, 1975), polylanguaging and polylingual languaging (Jørgensen, 2008; Jørgensen, Karrebæk, Madsen, & Møller, 2011), metrolingualism (Otsuji & Pennycook, 2011), codemeshing (Canagarajah, 2011), translingual practice…”
- Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications (2015, background): “Unlike the ‘double monolingualism norm’, which prescribes a separation of languages in actual use, and the ‘integrated bilingualism norm’, which assumes that speakers employ languages they are competent in and accommodate to their addressees or other situational requirements, the ‘polylingualism nor”
- Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca (2015, background): “For example, in her contribution to an AILA colloquium organized by ), translingual practices (e.g. Canagarajah 2011, 2013), polylanguaging/poly-lingual languaging (e.g. Jørgensen 2008, Jørgensen et al. 2011), super-diversity (e.g. Vertovec 2006, 2007), and mobile resources (e.g. Blommaert 2010).”
- Plurilingualism and Curriculum Design: Toward a Synergic Vision (2013, background): “A parallel shift is also evident in applied linguistics, where such ground-breaking notions as disinventing languages (Makoni, 2002; Makoni & Pennycook, 2007), translanguaging (Garc ıa, 2009), code-meshing (Canagarajah, 2006), multi-competence (Cook, 1991, 2007), polylingualism (Jørgensen, 2008), an”
- Translanguaging: developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation (2012, neutral): “Similar to Garcı́a (2009a), terms such as ‘‘metrolingualism’’ (Otsuji & Pennycook, 2011), ‘‘polylanguaging’’ and ‘‘polylingual languaging’’ (Jørgensen, 2008; Jørgensen, Karrebæk, Madsen, & Møller, 2011), ‘‘heteroglossia’’ (Bakhtin, 1981), ‘‘codemeshing’’ and ‘‘translingual practice’’ (Canagarajah,…”
- Language and Superdiversity (2016, neutral): “…‘polylingualism’, ‘translanguaging’, ‘metrolingualism’ and ‘new ethnicities and language’ (Bakhtin 1981, 1984, Creese and Blackledge 2010, Harris 2006, Jørgensen 2008, 2010, Leppänen 2012, Madsen 2008, Otsuji and Pennycook 2010, Rampton 1995, 2011a) (for reviews, see Auer 2006, Quist and…”
- Social inclusion and metrolingual practices (2011, background): “There are a number of studies that look at how young people appropriate language that is not associated with their ethnic and cultural background into their communicative repertoires to claim new identities (Auer 2007b; Deppermann 2007; Dirim and Hieronymus 2003; Heller 2007b; Jørgensen 2008).”
- Metrolingualism: fixity, fluidity and language in flux (2010, background): “Jørgensen (2008) and Møller (2008) propose the notion of polylingualism in place of multilingualism in light of the idea that ‘speakers use features and not languages’ (Jørgensen, 2008, p. 166).”