The time-course of visual threat processing: High trait anxious individuals eventually avert their gaze from angry faces

By Jean-Christophe Rohner. 2002

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a35bef5e6d1254a0db4d52bea72f44c376b48b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. B. Olatunji
2. Thomas Armstrong
3. Ernst H. W. Koster
4. Manuel G. Calvo
5. Peter J. Lang
6. J. Oakman
7. Geert Crombez
8. Josh M. Cisler

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. B. Olatunji
2. Thomas Armstrong
3. Ernst H. W. Koster
4. Manuel G. Calvo
5. Peter J. Lang
6. J. Oakman
7. Geert Crombez
8. Caitlin A. Wright

Citations in the corpus

• Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention (2004, methodology): “, 2000) or duration of fixations (Hermans et al., 1999; Rohner, 2002) was reported, but not both.”
• Mechanisms of Attentional Biases towards Threat in the Anxiety Disorders: An Integrative Review (2009, background): “Moreover, attentional avoidance of threat has been found when directly measuring eye fixations (Calvo & Avero, 2005; Garner, Mogg, & Bradley, 2006; Pflugshaupt et al., 2005; Rohner, 2002).”
• Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. (2012, background): “…Face 2 3.85° Event – Pflugshaupt et al. (2007) 21 21 42 SP Clinical 0.14% Picture 2 7.25° Event Epoch Rinck and Becker (2006) 22 23 45 SP Analogue 0.0 9% Picture 4 6.4° Event Event Rohner (2002) 52 48 100 GAD Analogue n/a Face 2 12° Epoch Epoch Schofield, Johnson, Inhoff, and Coles (2012) – – 42…”
• Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices (2014, background): “…of attentional processes in social anxiety (Buckner et al. 2010b; Gamble and Rapee 2010; Garner et al. 2006; Mühlberger et al. 2008; Schofield et al. 2012; Wieser et al. 2009a) as well as trait anxiety (Bradley et al. 2000; Calvo and Avero 2005; Mogg et al. 2007; Rohner 2002; Quigley et al. 2012).”
• Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. (2004, methodology): “Furthermore, the absence of vigilance effects at 500 ms picture presentation is supported by research on eye-movement registration (Hermans, Vansteenwegen, & Eelen, 1999; Rohner, 2002).”