Looking beyond the mortality of bycatch: sublethal effects of incidental capture on marine animals

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

FISH Out of WATER: How Much Air is Too Much? (2015, background): “Although it is often assumed that released fish will experience negligible consequences to lifetime fitness and will survive to return to the common population (Wydoski 1977; Wilson et al. 2014), a capture event and the associated handling can cause sublethal disturbances or mortality.”
Discards, hooking, and post-release mortality of porbeagle (Lamna nasus), shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), and blue shark (Prionace glauca) in the Canadian pelagic longline fishery (2016, background): “Predation on released fish and sublethal effects on reproduction are clear examples of processes that cannot be assessed at the time of capture (Raby et al., 2014; Wilson et al., 2014).”
Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world (2015, background): “For example, biochemical measures of stress responses linked with telemetry can explain and predict mortality rates associated with fishing; examples include salmon bycaught and released from nets (80) or sharks released from drum lines (81).”