Toward modern psychometrics: Application of item response theory models in personality research.

By Julien Morizot, Andrew Ainsworth, S. Reise. 2007

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Practical Guide to Conducting an Item Response Theory Analysis (2014, background): “That is, residual correlations were ≤ |.12|, which is below the |.20| cutoff suggested by Morizot, Ainsworth, and Reise (2007), further evidencing that LI is tenable.”
Putting the "IRT" in "Dirty" : item response theory analyses of the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen - an efficient measure of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism (2013, methodology): “We urge readers interested in IRT to consult relevant reviews (Morizot et al., 2007) and empirical examples (Ackerman et al., 2012; Fraley et al., 2000; Webster & Crysel, 2012).”
Measuring Student Involvement: A Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in the Construction of Scales from Student Surveys (2011, methodology): “…development/refinement, which was done using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), a technique that researchers have recommended be used during the initial development of a scale or instrument (Kahn 2006; Morizot et al. 2007; Reise et al. 2000; Clark and Watson 1995; Worthington and Whittaker 2006).”