Relative effects of biological amendments and crop rotations on soil microbial communities and soilborne diseases of potato

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The New Integrated Pest Management Paradigm for the Modern Age (2019, unknown): “…microbes, plant extracts, seaweed or algae impart induced systemic resistance to pests, diseases, and abiotic stressors, but are applied as amendments without any claims for pest or disease control (Larkin 2008, Vleesschauwer and Höfte 2009, Sharma et al. 2014, López-Bucio et al 2015, Dara 2018a).”
Soil microbial quality associated with yield reduction in continuous-pea (2009, background): “Crop rotation influences soil microbial communities (Grayston et al., 1998; Larkin, 2008; Spehn et al., 2000; Steer andHarris, 2000; Wardle, 1998) and soil quality (Bünemann et al.”
The impact of crop rotation on soil microbial diversity: A meta-analysis (2016, background): “Of the initial 27 studies, 7 had to be rejected for meta-analysis because they did not (1) report Shannon’s diversity index or richness scores (Chen et al., 2012; Ferreira et al., 2000; Larkin, 2008; Li et al., 2010; Souza et al., 2013), or (2) increase crop diversity over time (Dorr de Quadros et a”
Potato soil-borne diseases. A review (2011, background): “Indirectly, biological control agents can lead to the plant strengthening and a better resistance to pathogen attacks by producing plant growth hormone or by inducing the production of plant defense molecules such as phytoalexins and PR proteins (Stevenson et al. 2001; Larkin 2008).”