Social capital, civil society and development

By F. Fukuyama. 2001

1,972 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/794ece6fd933a98f09118f7c6af55c2400461b66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The interaction between social capital, creativity and efficiency in organizations (2018, background): “While social capital is defined as “an instantiated informal norm that promotes co-operation between two or more individuals” (Fukuyama, 2001), creativity is defined as “the generation of products or ideas that are both novel and appropriate” (Hennessey & Amabile, 2010).”
Rural–Urban Differences in Bonding and Bridging Social Capital (2016, positive): “Distinguishing between the two forms of trust agrees with the point made by FUKUYAMA (2001) that it is more informative to specify the radius of trust than to talk about trust in general on a onedimensional scale.”
Understanding the role of social capital in adoption decisions: An application to irrigation technology (2017, neutral): “Furthermore, closed networks are often negatively connected with lobbies or criminal organizations like the Mafia (Fukuyama, 2001), which are only acting for their own benefit.”
Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations (2014, background): “SSC arguably captures the most generic aspects of (weak-tie) social capital at the national level, that is, norms that facilitate interaction and cooperation even among strangers (Fukuyama, 2001; Westlund & Adam, 2010).”
Access to Rural Credit Markets in Developing Countries, the Case of Vietnam: A Literature Review (2019, background): “The effects of social capital, in general, are detailed in three forms: increasing information availability and reducing the cost; decisions/actions facilitation; and, diminishing opportunistic behavior by member individuals [75,76].”
Personal values and prosocial behaviour in strategic interactions: Distinguishing value‐expressive from value‐ambivalent behaviours (2013, background): “…(Fehr & Gächter, 2002), and trusting behaviour (measured in the trust game) has famously been argued to be the ‘lubricant that enables most essential everyday decisions’ (Arrow, 1972, p. 357; for the importance of trust for the functioning and development of modern economies, see Fukuyama, 2001).”
Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship (2017, background): “A society that values entrepreneurship may be more likely to reward an entrepreneur’s endeavors by sharing risk, providing social capital and valuable information and through cooperation – each of these is consequential to entrepreneurs’ initiatives in the country (Adler & Kwon, 2002; Fukuyama, 2001”
Human geography and the institutions that underlie economic growth (2011, background): “Restricting economic interactions to a narrow ‘radius of trust’ (Fukuyama, 2001) limits the range of options available, hinders the realization of scale economies, and restricts access to information which supports innovation and upgrading.”
The effect of social capital and altruism on seniors' revisit intention to social network sites for tourism-related purposes (2016, background): “While Bourdieu (1985), Everett (2002), and Fukuyama (2001) explain social capital toward similarities and differences from various cultures and histories, little or no attempt was made to apply multidimensional measures of social capital.”
Social trust and angel investors' decisions: a multilevel analysis across nations (2015, background): “As suchnetworks or groups enhance information-sharing opportunities, encourage joint problem solving, and improve supervision (Fukuyama, 1999), individuals with entrepreneurial skills have greater confidence in angel investments when the radius of trust is wide.”
NGOs, civil society and democratization: a critical review of the literature (2002, background): “Such a position is not unusual (see Fukuyama, 2001 ), and is problematic for several reasons.”
Entrepreneurship, Social Capital, and Institutions: Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship across Nations (2013, positive): “In addition, the national rate of social entrepreneurship is more closely correlated with generalized trust than with associational membership, which supports our proposition that social capital built by social entrepreneurship indicates the existence of cooperative norms of which generalized trust ”
Linking Loneliness, Shyness, Smartphone Addiction Symptoms, and Patterns of Smartphone Use to Social Capital (2015, background): “High levels of social capital were shown to be a success factor for establishing electronic-based social networks (Fukuyama, 2001), while ICTs with sophisticated networking infrastructure encourage the formation of social capital (Calabrese & Borchert, 1996).”
Building Trust in Economic Space (2006, background): “Scholars of the ‘new’ institutional economics commonly address this perspective and view trust as being an evolutionary outcome or byproduct of history (North, 1990; Dimaggio and Powell, 1991; Platteau, 1994a; 1994b; Fukuyama, 1995; 2001).”
Governing local sustainability (2006, background): “The concept has achieved wide usage in social science since it was popularized by James Coleman (1988) and Pierre Bourdieu (1986), and further developed by Robert Putnam (1993, 2000) and Francis Fukuyama (1995, 2001).”
Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, and addiction: Symptoms and patterns of cell phone use (2008, background): “High levels of social capital or strong, preexisting networks, for example, are seen to be a success factor in establishing electronic-based network (Fukuyama, 2001).”