Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach
By Felix Tung Sun Chan, Niraj Kumar. 2007
1,318 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79214240508742ae3ffca5e0511aff29ce05b498
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Metin Dagdeviren
- William Ho
- Ali Emrouznejad
- Saman Hassanzadeh Amin
- Guoqing Zhang
- Xin Ma
- Rosária de F. Segger Macri Russo
- Roberto Camanho
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- A two-stage Fuzzy-AHP model for risk assessment of implementing green initiatives in the fashion supply chain (2012, background): “This makes the task of expressing preferences using exact numerical values very difficult, hence decision making becomes challenging (Chan and Kumar, 2007).”
- A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers (2012, neutral): “And this framework was evaluated using a fuzzy AHP methodology.”
- Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods (2014, background): “Furthermore, the criteria are often of a subjective and qualitative nature, which has a negative impact on the decision-maker in terms of expressing his own references in numerical values and the subsequent comparison of the estimates (Chan and Kumar, 2007).”
- Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review (2010, methodology): “Chan and Kumar (2007) also used a fuzzy AHP for supplier selection as the case with Kahraman et al. (2003).”
- An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology (2010, background): “However, AHP is criticized for its inability to reflect the human cognitive process because it does not cope with the uncertainty and ambiguity, which occurs in decision-makers’ judgments (Kwong and Bai, 2003; Chan and Kumar, 2007; Lee et al., 2008; Fu et al., 2008).”
- Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle (2011, background): “…on supplier development were published in production- and operations management-related journals (Araz and Ozkarahan, 2007; Carr and Kaynak, 2007; Chan and Kumar, 2007; Krause et al., 2007; Lee and Humphreys, 2007; Li et al., 2007; Modi and Mabert, 2007; Rogers et al., 2007; Wouters et al.,…”
- A New Methodology of Multicriteria Decision-Making in Supplier Selection Based on -Numbers (2016, methodology): “In this section, a numerical example originated from [2] is presented to illustrate the procedure of the proposed model.”
- An integrated model for closed-loop supply chain configuration and supplier selection: Multi-objective approach (2012, methodology): “Besides, Chan and Kumar (2007) used fuzzy AHP method.”
- Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management (2008, methodology): “The proposed method with extent analysis is simple and easy for implementation to prioritize decision variables as compared with the conventional AHP [7].”
- Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain (2012, background): “Chan and Kumar (2007) developed a fuzzy extended analytic hierarchy process (FEAHP) model for global supplier selection.”