Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management

By Metin Dagdeviren, Ihsan Yüksel. Information Sciences, 2008

453 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions (2018, methodology): “factors occurrence, severity and detection and the extended VIKOR was used to determine risk priorities of the failure modes. A case was carried out in a general anesthesia process. As a shortcoming of the proposed approach, no sensitivity analysis was carried out in order to demonstrate the validit”
A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods (2010, methodology): “The underlying decision model based on the AHP methodology, Dagdeviren and Yuksel (2008) presented fuzzy AHP approach to determine the level of faulty behavior risk in work sys- tems.”
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (2014, methodology): “As to the FAHP, many researchers, such as Chang [10], Kulak and Kahraman [13], Erensal et al. [14], Bozbura et al. [16], and Dağdeviren and Yüksel [17], did not take the consistency checking process of the fuzzy preference relation into account.”