The Fourfold Pattern of Risk Attitudes in Choice and Pricing Tasks

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? (2010, background): “Specifically, and following Holt and Laury (2002), we estimate a constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility function that allows for a parameter that captures noisy behavior.”
The “bomb” risk elicitation task (2013, unknown): “14There is evidence in the literature that also this weak manipulation of subjects’ reference point is effective (Battalio et al., 1990; Harbaugh et al., 2010).”
A Theoretical and Experimental Appraisal of Five Risk Elicitation Methods (2013, unknown): “Harbaugh et al. (2010) compare the price-based Becker-DeGroot-Marschack (BDM) mechanism with a choice-based procedure (whether six lotteries are preferred or not to their expected value with certainty), the goal being to test the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes put forward by Tversky and…”
Measuring the time stability of Prospect Theory preferences (2010, unknown): “Kruse and Thompson (2003) Bleichrodt et al. (2007) Harbaugh et al. (2007) Anderson and Mellor (2009) Berg et al. (2005) Abdellaoui et al. (2007a)”