Institutional Change and Globalization
By John L. Campbell. 2020
1,511 citations recorded by the source corpus.
List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Preface xiii CHAPTER ONE Problems of Institutional Analysis 1 CHAPTER TWO The Problem of Change 31 CHAPTER THREE The Problem of Mechanisms 62 CHAPTER FOUR The Problem of Ideas 90 CHAPTER FIVE The Problem of Globalization 124 CHAPTER SIX Where Do W Go from Here? 172 APPENDIX Analysis of Tax Levels and Structures for Country Subgroups 191 References 205 Index 239
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78d1d3724154167b28d3cf8930e3cae3821fdfc9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Gregory Jackson
- Mauro F. Guillén
- Richard Deeg
- Isin Guler
- Tim Bartley
- Michael Lounsbury
- Matt Andrews
- G. Mcdermott
In Finance
- Gregory Jackson
- Richard Deeg
- Kathleen Thelen
- V. Schmidt
- Marc Schneiberg
- J. Campbell
- Marius R. Busemeyer
- Giovanni Capoccia
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- Varieties of Institutional Investors and National Models of Capitalism: The Transformation of Corporate Governance in France and Germany (2006, background): “As Campbell (2004) reminds us, we often mistake evolutionary shifts for more revolutionary developments and vice versa.4 The absence of an analytical framework to distinguish between patterns of institutional change leaves us powerless to distinguish between them and to understand their…”
- Change above the Glass Ceiling: Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity in Japanese Firms (2018, background): “institutions and provide alternative solutions (Campbell, 2004; Ahmadjian and Robbins, 2005; Desender et al., 2016).”
- Throwing Good Money after Bad? Political and Institutional Influences on Sequential Decision Making in the Venture Capital Industry (2007, background): “Institutions are the “formal and informal rules, monitoring and enforcement mechanisms, and systems of meaning that define the context within which individuals, corporations, labor unions, nation-states, and other organizations operate and interact with each other” (Campbell, 2004: 1).”
- Valence, Policy Ideas, and the Rise of Sustainability (2013, background): “Thus, valence could help us to move beyond simply examining the location of an authority figure to assess their influence (Campbell 2004: 76-77).”
- Macroeconomic and institutional determinants of financialisation of non-financial firms: Case study of Turkey (2014, methodology): “To tackle the stated methodological issues, most papers, such as Demir (2009), use the Arellano and Bond (1991) or Blundell and Bond (1998) generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators where lags of the dependent variable (y) and independent variables (x) are used as instruments.”
- Organizations, Regulation, and Economic Behavior: Regulatory Dynamics and Forms from the Nineteenth to Twenty-First Century (2008, background): “…of global models into local settings has shown that legal and organizational blueprints rarely emerge unscathed from a trip from one setting to another, instead getting altered via editing, retheorization, and creolization (Campbell 2004, Czarniawska-Joerges & Sevon 1996, Djelic 1998, Merry 2006).”
- Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control (2015, background): “…(i.e. the general norms that guide the approach taken to implementing policy goals, Howlett & Cashore 2009) and programmatic ideas (i.e. “elite prescriptions that enable politicians, corporate leaders, and other decision makers to chart a clear and specific course of action,” Campbell 2004, p. 94).”
- State Capacity, Minority Shareholder Protections, and Stock Market Development (2016, background): “Perhaps the most important implication of the paper is that the theory of country-level resilience to globalization pressures needs to be revised and enriched (Guillén, 2001; Campbell, 2004).”
- Comparing theories of institutional change (2009, background): “We have sought to include what we perceive as the main strands of thought in institutional economics, but for example, we do not discuss historical institutionalism in sociology and political science (Thelen, 2004; Campbell, 2004), although many related issues arise in that literature.”
- The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999 (2005, background): “Neo-institutional theory in sociology (Campbell 2004; DiMaggio and Powell 1983; Jepperson and Meyer 1991) posits three distinct mechanisms of diffusion: international coercion, which results from power dynamics; normative emulation, whereby actors intensely related to each other within a social…”
- Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’ (2010, background): “Scholars in the SI tradition have little difficulty with this approach to discourse, especially since discourse analyses of all kinds are loosely seen as part of SI (e.g., Bourdieu, 1990; Campbell and Pedersen, 2001; Campbell, 2004).”
- Institutional exceptions on global projects: a process model (2008, background): “Our study is grounded in a relatively broad conception of institutions, which we view as symbolic frameworks that provide guidelines for behavior, and lend stability, regularity, and meaning to social life (Campbell, 2004; Scott, 2001).”